D
Deleted member 219486
Galera pedia um meteoro e recebeu o coronavírus.
Registre uma conta gratuita hoje para se tornar um membro! Uma vez conectado, você poderá participar neste site adicionando seus próprios tópicos e postagens, além de se conectar com outros membros por meio de sua própria caixa de entrada privada!
2.3 ~ 2.9Qual a taxa de letalidade?
Até as últimas informações, por volta de 5%. Mas cabe a interpretação deles, são poucos casos de mortes, mas também são poucos dados como curados, enfim.Qual a taxa de letalidade?
Essa merece entrar para o Gambiarras maravilhosas
+60% virus resistance
-2 charisma
-5 speed
Para os teóricos da conspiração segue uma thread de um médico comentando o primeiro artigo com o RNA do coronavirus:
Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
7 hours ago, 10 tweets, 5 min read
“Where did the come from?” is one of the most asked questions. First, I don’t like unsupported conspiracy theories, but it’s a lingering question. @sciencemagazine examined this based on Lancet article. Nobody knows, but seafood market isn’t whole story
Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globallyDescription of earliest cases suggests outbreak began elsewherehttps://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally
2. Again, no outright conspiracy theories please. Here is another explanation: The new #coronavirus is an RNA virus—that is, viruses that have RNA as their genetic material rather than DNA—which have a “high mutation rate,” which allows it to “change properties very quickly.”
3. The RNA sequences of the #coronavirus isolated from 6 patients from the same household are different from each other (Lancet), sign of the virus evolving. This may not be so good to the ear; it suggests the difficulty of containing this virus”. (from
China Underreporting True Scale of Deadly Virus Outbreak, Expert SaysThe Chinese regime is likely underreporting the true scale of the coronavirus outbreak, according to a Harvard epidemiologist. ...https://m.theepochtimes.com/china-underreporting-true-scale-of-deadly-viral-outbreak-expert-says_3218207.html
)
4. DEEPER DIVE into #coronavirus RNA genome , here goes... “it came from bats ” is often heard, but it’s trickier. The has similarities to bat coronavirus, but this new paper REJECTS there was recent recombination. There is something discordant too:
Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination eventBackground: A novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) associated with human to human transmission and severe human infection has been recently reported from the city of Wuhan in China. Our objectives were to c…https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.26.920249v1
5. (Continued from above)... “A BLAST search of 2019-nCoV middle fragment revealed no considerable similarity with any of the previously characterized corona viruses (figure 2)” —> it’s a sequence entirely new to any known #coronavirus. What does this mean? We don’t know yet.
6. “Notably, the new coronavirus provides a new lineage for almost half of its genome, with no close genetic relationships to other viruses within the subgenus of sarbecovirus.” —> basically it’s saying it’s completely brand new to #coronavirus subgenus.
7. Very strange: So what is in this new mystery middle segment that has no #coronavirus history? The study authors continue: “This genomic part comprises also half of the spike region encoding a multifunctional protein responsible also for virus entry into host cells[30,31]”.
8. Continuing: “Our study rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event.”—> I.e. the authors also conclude that the new #coronavirus did not originate from random recent admixture between different coronaviruses. Other possibilities of course.
9. BOTTOMLINE: 1) Seafood market not the source. 2) This RNA #coronavirus mutates really fast. 3) has unusual middle segment never seen before in any coronavirus. 4) Not from recent mixing. 5) That mystery middle segment encodes protein responsible for entry into host cells.
10. TO BE CLEAR: I am absolutely not saying it’s bioengineering, nor am I supporting any conspiracy theories with no evidence. I’m simply saying scientists need to do more research + get more data. And finding the origin of the virus is an important research priority. Goodnight
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1221990534643929089.html
Original:
Alguns pontos:
6 pacientes diferentes da mesma família com coronavírus e cada um deles teve uma sequência de RNA diferente do vírus, indicando que ele é de mutação super rápida. A China acabou de confirmar mais 2000 casos novos de ontem pra hoje.
1)Mercado de frutos do mar não é a fonte.
2)Este RNA #coronavirus muda muito rápido.
3)tem segmento médio incomum nunca visto antes em nenhum coronavírus.
4)Não proveniente de mixagens recentes.
5)Esse misterioso segmento do meio codifica a proteína responsável pela entrada nas células hospedeiras.
+60% virus resistance
-2 charisma
-5 speed
Número de mortos pelo coronavírus aumenta para 106
https://oglobo.globo.com/sociedade/...-pelo-coronavirus-aumenta-para-106-1-24214944
Se for pra pegar que seja bem depois, depois do pico de hospitais lotados e já com tratamento certo.boa notícia mesmo isso do vírus estar ficando "mais fraco", tomara que se confirme
uma coisa que me pergunto, imaginando um cenário onde há infecção global, é melhor ser dos primeiros a pegar e ainda ter vaga nos hospitais ou ser infectado bem depois quando já estiver um caos nos hospitais, mas ter chances maiores de já haver um tratamento mais eficaz?
claro, a melhor opção é nenhuma delas
Eu acho que não é que está ficando menos letal. E sim que agora os dados são mais “reais”f) Por enquanto, BOA NOTÍCIA, o vírus está ficando menos letal.
Espero não fazer parte, só asssitir de longe.Parabéns estamos em um evento internacional.
Confiável?
China demands apology over Danish newspaper’s cartoon flag 'insult'
Ritzau/The Local
news@thelocal.dk
@thelocaldenmark
28 January 2020
11:50 CET+01:00
The cartoon as published in Jyllands-Posten. Photo: Ida Marie Odgaard/Ritzau Scanpix
China has objected to a satirical drawing of the Chinese flag published by a Danish newspaper on Monday.
https://www.thelocal.dk/20200128/china-demands-apology-over-danish-newspapers-cartoon-flag-insult
Parece que a grande maioria das infecções se deu por contato próximo. Se isso for verdade, será mais fácil controlar a doença.
A charge que foi publicada e que ofendeu os chineses.
Tá com pena ? Tá com peninha ? Então leva pra casa !Porra... Fiquei com pena. Devem estar desesperados.
Acabou máscaras em vários lugares, deve estar tenso, eles usam uma máscara por no máximo 4 horase depois tem que trocar.Porra... Fiquei com pena. Devem estar desesperados.