Falando em marketing mentiroso, olha a nova da NVIDIA
Nossa nova placa (RTX 3050) é "infinitamente" mais rápida em RT e DLSS do que os outros modelos básicos anteriores!
(só não vamos mencionar que os outros modelos básicos não suportam RT e DLSS)
NVIDIA claims GeForce RTX 3050 is infinite times faster than GTX 1650/1050 in the new RTX ON graph, but those do not support raytracing
Yesterday NVIDIA made an update to its upcoming GeForce RTX 3050 website where a new ‘performance’ graph has been revealed.
It probably wouldn’t have caught our attention if not for the fact that it is probably the most pointless graph ever made on the NVIDIA website. The company compares its RTX 3050 desktop card with GTX 1650 and GTX 1050, both considered successors to the upcoming Ampere model. Both cards shipped without hardware acceleration of raytracing.
In this graph, NVIDIA RTX 3050 desktop GPU is offering 60 (fps?) in Control and Minecraft, both games with RTX ON. Meanwhile, GTX 1650 and GTX 1050 do not support RTX (raytracing and DLSS) which is why they sit at 0.
The RTX 3050’s successors are doing a bit better in Borderlands 3, which luckily for all cards included, does not have raytracing.
GeForce RTX 3050 (raytracing & DLSS) performance, Source: NVIDIA