Tópico oficial GPUs Intel Arc

[young_retro]

Sabem aquele papo da Intel de Driver Day-0 pro Elden Ring?

Saiu não.

Talvez tenham esquecido do 1 e seja Day-10

 

[T1mp4s]

Sabem aquele papo da Intel de Driver Day-0 pro Elden Ring?

Saiu não.

Talvez por que o jogo esta tão cagado que eles nem ligaram de lançar driver

 

[Krion]

Intel 3rd Gen Arc GPUs to Feature 112MB of L2 Cache as NVIDIA Preps RTX 4080/4090 w/ 96MB of L2 Cache​

The graphics card market is going to get a whole lot more competitive in the coming years as chipmakers exploit every technology to push Moore’s Law to its limits. Starting with the adoption of chiplets for the RDNA 3-based Radeon RX 7900 XT/7800 XT GPUs, all three teams are keen on loading more and more SRAM onto their designs. AMD was the first to integrate a large L3 “Infinity” cache into its RDNA 2 architecture, and much like the chiplet route, its rivals are going to follow suit.





The recent NVIDIA data breach has already confirmed this. All the next-gen Ada Lovelace GPUs will pack a fat L2 cache, led by the AD102 and its 96MB L2 cache reserves. This is a massive increase over the 6MB of L2 cache housed by Ampere and Turing cores. What’s interesting though, is that while AMD has added a large third layer of cache to its RDNA 2 GPUs, both NVIDIA and Intel are consolidating the existing L2 banks.

According to @Kepler_L2, the 3rd Gen Arc Battlemage GPUs will also integrate a large L2 cache (up to 112MB), normalizing the use of massive SRAM banks in graphics processors. It’s unclear whether Battlemage will feature a chiplet design as well, but it’ll be absolutely necessary if Intel wants to compete in the high-end PC gaming and enthusiast segments.

 

[LucianoBraga]

Quero só ver o preço dessa brincadeira. Cache é caro pra c***lho.

 

[Skill_Floor]

Se elas suportarem vGPU sem frescura vai ser a rainha do custo-benefício. Nem vou considerar a concorrência.

 

[Abandonei a outerspace]

O custo de memória empilhada ainda é alto. GDDR6 ainda vai longe.

 

[Aigaion]

Sabem aquele papo da Intel de Driver Day-0 pro Elden Ring?
Saiu não.

Era para o Intel HD...

 

[LucianoBraga]

Era para o Intel HD...

Era pra todo mundo, mas não saiu pra ninguém.
Depois vieram "ahn, erros de última hora, estamos trabalhando com a Namco"

 

[Krion]

First Intel Arc Alchemist Gaming Graphics Cards Expected To Launch Between May-June​

Intel's Arc Alchemist graphics cards for the desktop PC segment are now expected to launch next quarter around May-June.

Intel Arc Alchemist Graphics Cards To Launch Next Quarter, First High-End Variants Expected In May-June​

The latest information comes from Igor Wallossek from Igor's Lab who has got new details on the launch schedule of the upcoming gaming lineup. As per him, the Intel Arc Alchemist graphics cards will indeed end up launching in Q2 2022 as the blue team confirmed but it looks the lineup would first include high-end variants and will eventually move to the mainstream segment. It is also stated that the QS samples are expected to tape out in 1-2 weeks which means that Intel will have at least 2 months of production capacity for the gaming segment.

Several different sources have told me of another Intel card postponement, at least as far as SKU 1 to 3, the three performance models, are concerned. There are currently consistent rumors that the first models will be released between May 2, 2022 and June 1, 2022. Furthermore, the tape-out of the QS (qualified sample) should not take place for 1-2 weeks.
via Igor's Lab

It looks like Igor is referring to the 'SOC 1' when talking about QS Tape-Out since the mobility Arc SOC 2 is already confirmed for launch this quarter. The 'SOC 2' is the smallest of the two chips so the full variant which is expected to ship on desktop first comes a little later and hence we the Q2 launch instead of Q1.


Source: VideoCardz.

We have already detailed the core architecture, specifications, and features of the Arc Alchemist lineup in our detailed roundup over here. As we know, the Intel Arc Alchemist lineup will feature two primary DG2 GPU SKUs, the big 'SOC 1' and the small 'SOC 2'. SOC 1 will feature the DG2-512 configuration and will be utilized by the Arc A700 and Arc A500 series graphics solutions while the SOC 2 config that will utilize the DG2-128 SKU, will be utilized by the Arc A300 series.




At least three SKUs are expected to launch within the Intel Arc Alchemist discrete desktop graphics card lineup for gaming PCs. If all goes according to plan, Intel hopes to ship at least a million GPUs based on its Arc design each year.

Intel Xe-HPG Based Discrete Alchemist GPU Configurations:​

GPU Variant	Graphics Card Variant	GPU Die	Execution Units	Shading Units (Cores)	Memory Capacity	Memory Speed	Memory Bus	TGP
Xe-HPG 512EU	ARC A780?	Alchemist-512EU	512 EUs	4096	Up To 32/16 GB GDDR6	18 / 16 / 14 Gbps	256-bit	~225W (Desktops) 120-150W (Laptops)
Xe-HPG 384EU	ARC A580?	Alchemist-512EU	384 EUs	3072	Up To 12 GB GDDR6	16 / 14 Gbps	192-bit	150-200W (Desktops) 80-120W (Laptops)
Xe-HPG 256EU	ARC A550?	Alchemist-512EU	256 EUs	2048	Up To 8 GB GDDR6	16 / 14 Gbps	128-bit	60-80W (Laptops)
Xe-HPG 128EU	ARC A380?	Alchemist-128EU	128 EUs	1024	Up To 6 GB GDDR6	16 / 14 Gbps	96-bit	~75W (Desktops)
Xe-HPG 128EU	ARC A350?	Alchemist-128EU	128 EUs	1024	Up To 4 GB GDDR6	16 / 14 Gbps	64-bit	35-50W (Laptops)
Xe-HPG 96EU	ARC A330?	Alchemist-128EU	86 EUs	768	Up To 4 GB GDDR6	16 / 14 Gbps	64-bit	~35W (Laptops)

 

[LucianoBraga]

Intel Arc Alchemist GPUs for Laptops Scheduled for March 30th Launch​

by AleksandarK Today, 14:39 Discuss (0 Comments)
"Join us on March 30th at 8 A.M. Pacific Time to see Intel Arc graphics take center stage and get a first look at our new discrete graphics for laptops." - is the statement that Intel posted on its website regarding the launch of its upcoming Arc Alchemist GPUs for laptops. While we await the final reveal of the desktop Arc Alchemist graphics cards, it looks like team blue will give us a very first look at Arc discrete graphics cards for laptops. Regarding the performance numbers, Intel's Lisa Pearce, Vice President and General Manager for the Visual Compute Group, posted a quick performance claim stating that the Intel Arc A370M mobile GPU will feature two-fold performance improvement over integrated GPU designs found in Intel Core i7-12700H processor.

Lisa PearceWhat performance can we expect from the first product to make it to market, the Intel Arc A370M?
The first Intel Arc discrete graphics products to enter the mobile market will enable up to a 2X improvement in graphics performance vs. integrated graphics alone while maintaining similar form factors.
2x performance claim based on average FPS at 1080p Medium with Metro Exodus (DX12) as of March 3, 2022 as the beginning of the disclosure. Intel Arc system: Intel Core i7-12700H processor 14C/20T, 32 GB 4800Mhz system memory, Intel Arc A370M graphics, Windows 11 Pro v10.0.22000, Preproduction driver as of March 2022, total system TDP 40 W. Intel Core system: Intel Core i71280P 14C/20T, 32 GB 4800 MHz system memory, Iris Xe integrated graphics, Windows 11 Pro 21H2 22000.493, Driver version 30.0.101.1029, total system TDP 28 W.

A Intel diz que o A370M alcança duas vezes a performance da Xe 96EU da gen anterior, e eu tô rodando tudo com a Xe 96EU aqui.
Render mais num design dedicado não é particularmente difícil, porque o clock da Xe onboard é bastante conservador - o modelo de clock mais alto é 1400Mhz, o meu é 1300 - mas no meu SoC ela precisa dividir TDP com a CPU.

 

[Skinner Sweet]

Quero saber de preços

 

[LucianoBraga]

Quero saber de preços

Tem GDC esses dias que eles vão falar de RT e XeSS, mas acho que não tem apresentação das placas não. E e esse evento do dia 30 em tese é só pras GPUs mobile.
Não sei se já vai rolar info de preço e configurações definitivas...

 

[kapiel10]

boa tarde a todos !

estou no socket 775 e pretendo migrar para 1155 , qual processador deste socket rodaria videos 4k ? um i5 ? alguém sabe essa informação ?

sei que os processadores deste socket vem com video integrado e por isso da minha pergunta de saber se algum processador deste socket consegue rodar youtube ou filmes no pc em 4k+60fps

 

[LucianoBraga]

boa tarde a todos !

estou no socket 775 e pretendo migrar para 1155 , qual processador deste socket rodaria videos 4k ? um i5 ? alguém sabe essa informação ?

sei que os processadores deste socket vem com video integrado e por isso da minha pergunta

Nenhum. E esse tópico não é pra isso.

 

[wtsds]

boa tarde a todos !

estou no socket 775 e pretendo migrar para 1155 , qual processador deste socket rodaria videos 4k ? um i5 ? alguém sabe essa informação ?

sei que os processadores deste socket vem com video integrado e por isso da minha pergunta de saber se algum processador deste socket consegue rodar youtube ou filmes no pc em 4k+60fps

Pergunta aqui:

Tópico oficial - Recomendações de Hardware

Tem os kits no aliexpress com 5600G também, dá um desempenho bem legal, parte ruim é que o AM4 ta no fim da vida

forum.outerspace.com.br

Mas o Luciano já respondeu!

 

[kapiel10]

Nenhum. E esse tópico não é pra isso.

Pergunta aqui:

Tópico oficial - Recomendações de Hardware

Tem os kits no aliexpress com 5600G também, dá um desempenho bem legal, parte ruim é que o AM4 ta no fim da vida

forum.outerspace.com.br

Mas o Luciano já respondeu!

foi mal como não vi tópico oficial de processadores da intel achei que fosse aqui (já que processadores da intel tem video integrado) é eu sei, lógica meio viajada mas foi isso que pensei

vlw pela orientação

 

[LucianoBraga]

MS tá ajudando a Massive Work Studios - que é BR - a implementar o XeSS no jogo deles, DOLMEN.

 

[LucianoBraga]

E mais um.

 

[LucianoBraga]

 

[LucianoBraga]

XeSS compatible games "de cara":

• Shadow of the Tomb Raider
• Hitman III
• Super People
• The Settlers
• Dolmen
• Anvil
• Arcadegeddon
• Ghostwire: Tokyo
• Grid Legends
• Vampire: Blood Hunt
• Chorus
• Death Stranding
• Chivalry II
• Enlisted

A Intel disse que serão mais de 20, mas só listou esses 14. Presumo que esses são os 100% confirmados.

Curioso o fato de que Hitman III e Shadow of the Tomb Raider de novo estão aí, apesar de serem jogos mais antigos. Meu palpite é que o código dos jogos é tão limpo que fica muito fácil implementar qualquer coisa.

Na lista de "parceiros da tecnologia" também constam Ubi, PUBG Studios e Techland, então eu creio que Dying Light e PUBG (dã) também estão engatilhados.

A questão é que, se vocês se lembram, o XeSS vai ter dois "caminhos": XMX - motor de matriz ("tensor") proprietário das GPUs Intel - e DP4a - que contempla de Nvidia Pascal pra frente, de AMD RDNA pra frente e Intel Xe-LP. No lançamento da tecnologia será disponibilizado o XMX, mas não o DP4a, que é mais abrangente. Se o FSR 2.0 realmente entregar bons resultados, mesmo que não seja muito diferente do que o TSR da Unreal entrega, porque c***lho alguma produtora vai implementar o XeSS por XMX que simplesmente não tem volume de hardware compatível?

Não faz o menor sentido. Seria uma put* duma perda de tempo e aumenta a chance do XeSS ser tão insignificante de cara que não tenha chance de decolar depois.

 

[Krion]

Intel Arc desktop GPU showcased​

The desktop Arc A-Series graphics cards might not be ready for launch yet, but the company is actually ready to show off the design.

The dual-fan and dual-slot Arc Alchemist desktop GPU has been showcased for the first time through a teaser video posted by Intel. This cooler design is similar to the leaked prototypes, however it is clearly not the same.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



The graphics card will be kept in metallic gray/dark silver colors with at least one Intel Arc logo illuminated by LEDs. There is no sign of any power connectors yet, which is quite intriguing to say the least.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel




Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



The teaser video indicates that we are looking at a full-spec ACM-G10 GPU with 32 Xe-Cores and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The card offers four display outputs, including three DisplayPort and one HDMI.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



Intel clarifies that this ‘Limited Edition’ of desktop GPU will be available in summer. However, it is not explained what ‘limited’ here really means.


Source:

 

[T.Chico]

Intel Arc desktop GPU showcased​

The desktop Arc A-Series graphics cards might not be ready for launch yet, but the company is actually ready to show off the design.

The dual-fan and dual-slot Arc Alchemist desktop GPU has been showcased for the first time through a teaser video posted by Intel. This cooler design is similar to the leaked prototypes, however it is clearly not the same.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



The graphics card will be kept in metallic gray/dark silver colors with at least one Intel Arc logo illuminated by LEDs. There is no sign of any power connectors yet, which is quite intriguing to say the least.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel




Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



The teaser video indicates that we are looking at a full-spec ACM-G10 GPU with 32 Xe-Cores and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The card offers four display outputs, including three DisplayPort and one HDMI.


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Limited Edition Graphics Card, Source: Intel



Intel clarifies that this ‘Limited Edition’ of desktop GPU will be available in summer. However, it is not explained what ‘limited’ here really means.


Source:

Ficou bonita, visual sóbrio.

 

[Krion]

Intel Arc A370M is Up to 90% Slower than AMD’s Radeon RX 6500M in Gaming Workloads​

Intel’s 1st Gen Arc Alchemist GPUs are looking more and more dismal with the latest benchmarks showing that the A370M will be up to 90% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6500M in gaming workloads. This info comes from two sources. The first is AMD itself according to whom the 6500M absolutely destroys the entry-level Alchemist. Team Red’s benchmarks consist of five titles at 1080p netting over 90 FPS on average while the Arc A370M barely manages to hit the 60 FPS mark.

This is quite impressive as the Arc A370M packs 7.2 billion transistors, roughly 30% more than the Radeon which totals 5.4 billion transistors. As per Prohardver, the 50W Arc A370M is between 30-90% slower than the GeForce RTX 3050 and the Radeon RX 6500M. The ACM-G11 die powering the A350M and A370M comes with a 96-bit bus but both are limited to a 64-bit bus. The RTX 3050 features a 128-bit bus but the RX 6500M has a paltry 64-bit interface despite which it crushes the Arc A370M.

This falls in line with what we reported about the A350M the other day. Leaked 3DMark benchmarks show the 5-year-old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti beating it in Firestrike while offering similar performance in Timespy. It’s worth noting that both GPUs come with 768 shaders and similar external bandwidth which indicates poor effective IPC.

 

[Krion]

Intel Arc Alchemist A770 Desktop Gaming Graphics Card With 512 EUs & 2.4 GHz GPU Clock Speed Spotted​

Intel's Arc Alchemist A770 desktop graphics card has made a surprise appearance within the Geek Bench OpenCL benchmark once again.

Intel Arc A770 Desktop Gaming Graphics Card Spotted Within The OpenCL Benchmark: 512 EUs Running at 2.4 GHz​

This isn't the first time that Intel's flagship Arc Alchemist GPU configuration has been benchmarked within the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark but it is definitely the first time that it's been listed with its proper naming. The Intel Arc A770 graphics card is going to be a high-end gaming graphics card featuring the full ACM-G10 GPU, the flagship of the two Arc Alchemist GPUs.


Intel's high-end Arc A770 desktop graphics card featuring the ACM-G10 Alchemist GPU has been spotted within Geekbench. (Image Credits: Benchleaks)
The Intel Arc 7 lineup is going to utilize the flagship ACM-G10 GPU and we already know about the mobility variants which include the Arc A770M and the Arc A730M. Similarly, the Arc A770 is one of the top-end variants for desktop PCs that is equipped with the full ACM-G10 configuration, utilizing 32 Xe-Cores for 4096 ALUs, and 32 ray tracing units.


Now Geekbench doesn't list down the exact VRAM configuration and states 12.7 GB which is an incorrect reading so it is most likely 16 GB GDDR6. Also, it was previously stated that the flagship graphics card is meant to be the Arc A780 so this could be a clock-optimized GPU variant with the A780 launching as the Limited Edition model teased during the Arc A-series launch event.

Intel ARC ACM-G10 vs NVIDIA GA104 & AMD Navi 22 GPUs​

Graphics Card Name	Intel ARC A770?	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU Name	ACM-G10	NVIDIA GA104	AMD Navi 22
Architecture	Xe-HPG	Ampere	RDNA 2
Process Node	TSMC 6nm	Samsung 8nm	TSMC 7nm
Die Size	406mm2	392mm2	335mm2
Transistors	21.7B	17.4B	17.2B
Transistor Density	53.4M Transistors/mm2	44.4M Transistors/mm2	51.2M Transistors/mm2
FP32 Cores	32 Xe Cores	48 SM Units	40 Compute Units
FP32 Units	4096	6144	2560
Max Clock	~2400 MHz	1770 MHz	2581 MHz
FP32 TFLOPs	~20 TFLOPs	21.75 TFLOPs	13.21 TFLOPs
Memory Bus	256-bit	256-bit	192-bit
Memory Capacity	16 GB GDDR6	8 GB GDDR6X	12 GB GDDR6
Launch	Q2 2022	Q2 2021	Q1 2021

In terms of clocks, the GPU operates at a peak boost of 2.4 GHz which is always going to be higher than its advertised engine clock speed. At 2400 MHz, the GPU should be able to deliver close to 20 TFLOPs of FP32 horsepower.



As for the performance, the Intel Arc Alchemist A770 scored 85585 points in the OpenCL graphics benchmark which is very low for such a high-end graphics card but that is to be expected since the graphics drivers aren't yet optimized for the high-end parts. Even the entry-level ACM-G11 GPUs are yet to be properly optimized through drivers so we can expect the performance to be improved in the coming months. Currently, the card is on par with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and we can expect it to end up close to the RTX 3070 and 6700 XT by the time it launches by the end of the second quater of 2022.

News Source: Benchleaks

 

[T.Chico]

Performance broxante, se for isso mesmo, vai depender do preço.

 

[LucianoBraga]

Deve melhorar ainda.
Time de drivers da Intel tá lento que dói, é o cenário/problema que eu sempre apontei.

 

[Haagenti]

To com receio de, no atraso de drivers funcionais, os vermes bitconheiros limpem o estoque se sair alguma solução que otimiza mineração.
Obs: peço perdão a quem se ofenda, mas honestamente não consigo gostar de quem corrói o mercado das placas dos meus joguinhos com bitcoin.

 

[LucianoBraga]

To com receio de, no atraso de drivers funcionais, os vermes bitconheiros limpem o estoque se sair alguma solução que otimiza mineração.
Obs: peço perdão a quem se ofenda, mas honestamente não consigo gostar de quem corrói o mercado das placas dos meus joguinhos com bitcoin.

Os drivers até que são funcionais. Pecam um pouco em questões de compatibilidade - mas melhorou um absurdo de um ano pra cá - e definitivamente afetam o aproveitamento de performance. Meio que como na AMD, só que pior. Quero crer que vão melhorar com o tempo, mas que eles vão ter que melhorar o time, vão.

E acredito que o mercado consumidor - qualquer mercado - não vai embarcar na Intel de cara, então vai ter placa disponível.

 

[T1mp4s]

To com receio de, no atraso de drivers funcionais, os vermes bitconheiros limpem o estoque se sair alguma solução que otimiza mineração.
Obs: peço perdão a quem se ofenda, mas honestamente não consigo gostar de quem corrói o mercado das placas dos meus joguinhos com bitcoin.

Tem que ser xarope para ainda estar comprando placas para minerar, eu mesmo só estou esperando fazer um dinheiro aqui(daqui 5 dias) e paro de minerar, eu vou desmontar tudo aqui e inclusive vender um pc que minerava.
Bitcoin caido, dificuldade aumentou e as placas ainda estão caras, lucro quase zero o que significa que as placas nem se pagariam, sério, só sendo doido pra querer minerar nessas condições, eu vou zarpar.

 

[LucianoBraga]

Tem que ser xarope para ainda estar comprando placas para minerar, eu mesmo só estou esperando fazer um dinheiro aqui(daqui 5 dias) e paro de minerar, eu vou desmontar tudo aqui e inclusive vender um pc que minerava.
Bitcoin caido, dificuldade aumentou e as placas aina estão caras, lucro quase zero o que significa que as placas nem se pagariam, sério, só sendo doido pra querer minerar nessas condições, eu vou zarpar.

Muita gente já dropou, muita gente ainda vai dropar. Quem estiver disposto a pegar placa que foi usada pra mineração nos próximos meses vai achar umas coisas baratas, creio.

 

[Krion]

Parece que vão atrasar mais um pouquinho ainda no lançamento:

Intel delaying desktop Arc A-Series (again)?​

There is a new report on Intel desktop Arc Alchemist GPUs from “Enthusiastic Citizen”, who shared confidential and accurate Intel information in the past.

Although we are past the official launch of Intel Arc mobile GPUs, the desktop implementation of the Xe-HPG architecture can still only portrayed through a domain of rumors. Intel has been very reluctant to share any official information on their desktop series, although the company did tease a “Limited Edition” of a graphics card coming this summer.

Yesterday, we have learned about Arc A770 desktop graphics card, which was leaked through Geekbench entry. What that entry told is that Intel is preparing a part with a boost clock up to 2.4 GHz and 12.7GB of memory. Such part and three other SKUs are mentioned by the leaker in a message that was posted a few days ago and spotted by Wccftech today:


Intel Arc Alchemist Desktop Rumors, Source: Bilibili



First and foremost, the leaker says that there is another delay for desktop Arc launch till late Q2 or early Q3. After all, Intel only confirmed it will be launching ‘Limited Edition’ this summer, with no confirmation of any other desktop part for this period. Given how poorly the mobile Arc A-Series launch was executed (it is still exclusive to one country after 2 weeks since being officially ‘available now’), one simply cannot believe anything Intel has to say about their Arc launch schedule anymore. With that in mind, rumors about desktop delay make a lot of sense.

The leaker also mentions that there are four desktop parts planned, with a possible 5th variant launching later. The Arc A770, A750, A580 and A380 desktop SKUs are mentioned, with A770 leading the way with RTX 3060 Ti-like performance. It is believed that Intel might be launching an even faster part, but this is probably where the “Limited Edition” comes in. It is said that the A770 actually has less than 16GB memory, so 12GB/10GB would be on a table. Yesterday’s leak did suggest, though, it might be a 16GB graphics card. So clearly, there is still a lot of confusion surrounding this SKU.

Interestingly, “Citizen” reveals Intel plans for a part called Arc A750. One could expect this SKU to feature 448 Xe Vector Engines (Execution Units), as teased through numerous leaks in the past (some originating at Intel). This part, along with A580, would feature 8GB GDDR6 memory. The slowest desktop part, known as A380 would offer Radeon RX 6400 performance, the report claims.


Intel Arc A-Series Desktop “Limited Edition” Graphics Card, Source: Intel



What the report is missing is the information on the “Limited Edition”. This part is clearly equipped with eight GDDR6 memory modules, therefore 16GB memory is seemingly confirmed. This could either be the rumored A780, or a special edition of A770 with more memory.

VideoCardz.com	Arc A780 (LE?)	Arc A770	Arc A750	Arc A580	Arc A380
Desktop Intel ARC Alchemist (Rumored)
GPU	ACM-G10	ACM-G10	ACM-G10	ACM-G10	ACM-G11
Xe Cores	32	32	28	16	8
Execution Units	512	512	448	256	128
FP32 Cores	4096	4096	3584	3072	1024
Memory Size	16GB GDDR6	12GB GDDR6	8GB GDDR6	8GB GDDR6	6GB GDDR6
Memory Bus	256-bit	192-bit	128-bit	128-bit	96-bit

Source: 热心市民描边怪 (Enthusiastic Citizen) via Wccftech

 

[T.Chico]

Logo vai sair junto com as RTX 40/50 e RX7000 ai ninguém vai querer isso.

 

[Gray-fox]

Intel já perdeu o timing de lançamento, deveriam ter lançado no começo do ano, aproveitando os preços insanos das GPUS pra inflar o mercado com suas GPUS mais baratas (se a performance fosse como eles prometeram dos flagships entre 3060 e 70), agora o mercado está estabilizando e os preços caindo, a intel entrando com um produto mais fraco e sem a confiança dos consumidores, ninguém mais liga.

Deveriam evitar o fiasco desse lançamento das Alchemist, pois quando saírem as Lovelace e RDNA3 já vão estar no forno e como as atuais intel já são muito provavelmente defasadas pra atual série de GPUS, imaginem para as próximas?

A Intel deveria cancelar essas Alchemist e partir com foco total logo para as Battlemage.

 

[LucianoBraga]

Intel já perdeu o timing de lançamento, deveriam ter lançado no começo do ano, aproveitando os preços insanos das GPUS pra inflar o mercado com suas GPUS mais baratas (se a performance fosse como eles prometeram dos flagships entre 3060 e 70), agora o mercado está estabilizando e os preços caindo, a intel entrando com um produto mais fraco e sem a confiança dos consumidores, ninguém mais liga.

Deveriam evitar o fiasco desse lançamento das Alchemist, pois quando saírem as Lovelace e RDNA3 já vão estar no forno e como as atuais intel já são muito provavelmente defasadas pra atual série de GPUS, imaginem para as próximas?

A Intel deveria cancelar essas Alchemist e partir com foco total logo para as Battlemage.

As fabs não tinham janela. Não tinha como produzir pra lançar.

Mercado low-end tá largado. Se eles arrumarem um produto minimamente ok pro segmento, vai vender pra c***lho.

 

[rizabr]

Mercado low-end tá largado. Se eles arrumarem um produto minimamente ok pro segmento, vai vender pra c***lho.

Parece q o povo da pasta acredita q todo mundo tem no mínimo 3k pra gastar com vga