- Mensagens
- 50.366
- Reações
- 175.968
- Pontos
- 2.234
E textura geralmente só custa RAM, então se o cara tiver pelo menos um SSD e uma CPU pelo menos 4C que consiga puxar rápido, compensa setar.
Registre uma conta gratuita hoje para se tornar um membro! Uma vez conectado, você poderá participar neste site adicionando seus próprios tópicos e postagens, além de se conectar com outros membros por meio de sua própria caixa de entrada privada!
sobre esse negocio de ultra, tem settings em ultra que realmente fazem diferença, e outras nao, e depende do game.
no RDR2, textura em ultra faz muita diferença, efeitos de iluminação também melhoram bastante. Mas tem um monte de settings lá, que em ultra e high nao faz diferença nenhuma.
por isso o ideal é otimizar mexendo nas settings pra mistura high com ultra, conforme fez o Hardware unboxed naquele video de otimização ideal do RDR2.
Essa discussão era do outro tópico não?E textura geralmente só custa RAM, então se o cara tiver pelo menos um SSD e uma CPU pelo menos 4C que consiga puxar rápido, compensa setar.
Essa discussão era do outro tópico não?
By the end of April, we will add a UI option that allows users to toggle these benchmark specific optimizations on and off. This gives anyone the ability to see the top-level Intel Arc hardware potential of a fully optimized workload, as well as general benchmark performance. When the toggle is in place and the benchmark optimizations are disabled by default, the driver will be eligible for approval by UL.
— Lisa Pearce, VP and GM, Intel Visual Compute Group
In other words, the 2022 Rollout that Intel has presented at the beginning of this year clearly did not mention the exclusiveness for certain markets. We can probably forget about global arability of Intel Arc GPUs for weeks to come.Question #2: When are the desktop cards with Intel Arc graphics coming?
Unlike notebook designs, desktop systems have a vast set of combinations, including memory, motherboards, and CPUs. To initially limit some of this variation, we will launch working with system builders and OEMs with specific configurations.
We will release our entry-level Intel Arc A-series products for desktops (A3) first in China through system builders and OEMs in Q2. Etail and retail component sales will follow shortly in China as well. Proximity to board components and strong demand for entry-level discrete products makes this a natural place to start. Our next step will be to scale these products globally.
Roll-out of Intel Arc A5 and A7 desktop cards will start worldwide with OEMs and system integrators later this summer, followed by component sales in worldwide channels.
This staggered approach gives us confidence at each step that we can effectively serve our customer base.
Intel Arc desktop graphics cards from Intel are further delayed (could be September)
Byt the time these get released, they'll be outdated. According to Intel's official statement, Arc desktop graphics cards will not be available in the nearest future....www.guru3d.com
Já dá pra considerar as ARC alchemist natimortas?
Pior que o que eu tenho visto da A370M tem sido interessante, efetivamente trocando porrada com a 3050 - mas consumindo 30W.
Estar duas gerações atrás não é um problema inatacável. A AMD esteve várias vezes e sobreviveu - mesmo tendo muito menos dinheiro. Com o refresh da RDNA2 agora, alcançou a Nvidia em performance. Só que a Intel vai ter que compensar no preço.
When paired with a compatible processor
Claim: The Intel Arc A380 GPU, with a recommended customer price of 1,030 yuan, delivers up to 25% better performance per yuan than available competitive offerings as measured by performance on a selection of popular games.
GPU(s): Intel® Arc™ A380 6GB reference card
AMD Radeon RX 6400 4GB
System Configuration: Intel® Arc™ A380 configuration: Graphics Driver: 30.0.101.1735, Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-12600K, MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4, BIOS: 1.3, Memory: 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 @ 3200MHz, Storage: MP600 PRO XT 4TB, OS: Windows 11 Version 10.0.22000.675
AMD Radeon RX 6400 configuration: Graphics Driver: 30.0.15021.11005, Processor: Intel® Core™ i5-12600K, MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4, BIOS: 1.3, Memory: 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 @ 3200MHz, Storage: MP600 PRO XT 4TB, OS: Windows 11 Version 10.0.22000.675
Measurements: All FPS (frames per second) scores are either measured with PresentMon or in-game benchmark. All gameplay has a documented workload running the same replay or game scenario across all configurations and test runs.
Game workloads that support this claim are Naraka Bladepoint (27)%, JX Remake (27%), F1 2021 (26%), Rust (24%), Total Saga: Troy (22%), The Witcher 3 (22%), Arcadegeddon (21%), Metro Exodus (18%), NiZhan (16%), Wolfenstein: Youngblood (15%), Destiny 2 (14%).
All games tested at 1080p resolution and medium settings presets.
Period: Pricing and testing as of June 12, 2022. Radeon RX 6400 pricing of 1199 yuan on JD.com.
via Intel
Graphics Card Variant | GPU Variant | GPU Die | Execution Units | Shading Units (Cores) | Memory Capacity | Memory Speed | Memory Bus | TGP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arc A780 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | ~275W |
Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | ~250W |
Arc A770 | Xe-HPG 512EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 512 EUs (TBD) | 4096 (TBD) | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 256-bit | ~250W |
Arc A750 | Xe-HPG 384EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 384 EUs (TBD) | 3072 (TBD) | 12 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 192-bit | ~200W |
Arc A580 | Xe-HPG 256EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G10 | 256 EUs (TBD) | 2048 (TBD) | 8 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 128-bit | ~150W |
Arc A380 | Xe-HPG 128EU (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 128 EUs (TBD) | 1024 (TBD) | 6 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 96-bit | ~100W |
Arc A350 | Xe-HPG 96 (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 96 EUs (TBD) | 768 (TBD) | 4 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 64-bit | ~75W |
Arc A310 | Xe-HPG 64 (TBD) | Arc ACM-G11 | 64 EUs (TBD) | 512 (TBD) | 4 GB GDDR6 | 16 Gbps | 64-bit | ~50W |
VideoCardz.com | GPU | Xe Cores | Memory Size | Memory Bus | MSRP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUMORED Desktop Intel ARC Alchemist Series Specifications | |||||
Arc A770 | ACM-G10 | 32 | 16GB GDDR6 | 256-bit | TBC |
Arc A750 | ACM-G10 | 24 | 12GB GDDR6 | 192-bit | TBC |
Arc A580 | ACM-G10 | 16 | 8GB GDDR6 | 128-bit | TBC |
Arc A380 | ACM-G11 | 8 | 6GB GDDR6 | 96-bit | $129-$139 |
Arc A310 | ACM-G11 | 4 | 4GB GDDR6 | 64-bit | TBC |
A Intel soltou um slides sobre essa A750. E em 5 jogos ela bateu a 3060 da Nvidia. Fiquei até surpreso! Mas dai pelo review do gamernexus, se a placa não tiver com rizese bar la ativado, q só tem nas placas mães da intel, o desempenho da placa parece q cai mais de 50%. Pra quem tem AMD tem q correr dessas placas da Intel!
O que a AMD chama de "Smart Access Memory" é o Resizable Bar.
Então, se o cara tem bios atualizada em A520, B550 ou X570 e CPU Zen 2 ou Zen 3, tá coberto.
Mas no video ele falou q essa m**** só funciona com placas mães Intel! Então entendi errado!
Tecnicamente, Resizable Bar é só na Intel porque a AMD chama de Smart Access Memory, mas é o mesmo recurso. Não tem motivo de ordem prática pra funcionar em uma e não na outra, a não ser que a Intel tenha travado intencionalmente, o que seria extremamente imbecil pra quem tá entrando num mercado do zero.
A770 | A750 | A580 | A380 | A310 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Segment | Performance + | Performance+ | Performance – | Mainstream – | Entry |
TDP | 225W | 225W | 175W | 75W | 75W |
Memory | 16/8 GB | 8GB | 8GB | 6GB | 4GB |
Tentative MSRP | $349-$399 | $279-$349 | $200-249 | $125-$149 | ~$100 |
Gaming with Intel’s Arc A380, even with the latest driver, is like living in the middle of a minefield – mind you, playing while drunk. There is no other way to describe the past working days with the Arc A380. You don’t even know where to start. In its current state, it is completely incomprehensible how a large and reputable company like Intel can sell such a product to even a single customer.
— Wolfgang Andermahr, ComputerBase
Os drivers de lançamento da Intel parece que estão meio
Intel Arc A380 discrete GPU reviews: “it’s like living in the middle of a minefield”
Intel Arc A380 is crippled with software issues
Intel Arc A380 reviews leave a stain on company’s reputation.
Intel Arc A380, Source: ComputerBase & Igor’sLAB
Western tech media is disappointed with how Intel introduced the Arc Alchemist GPUs. Not only the new discrete architecture was delayed, but also made exclusive to one country. This obviously did not stop them from acquiring samples on their own, however this obviously took more time. Some media outlets decided to buy A380 GPU together to save the cost of shipping from China. They also self-imposed an embargo on their reviews which has lifted today.
In addition to numerous Chinese reviews, this is the last couple of days have seen a review from Russian PRO Hi-Tech, Spanish Professional Review and three German outlets: Golem, Computer Base and Igor’sLAB. We have a round-up of many reviews here.
ComputerBase: “It’s like living in the middle of a minefield while playing drunk”:
Problems with Intel Arc A380, Source: ComputerBase
Intel ARC A380 “is by no means a total failure“, notes ComputerBase. However, the GPU does not pair well with AMD’s slowest RDNA GPU (RX 6400) and NVIDIA’s 3-year-old GTX 1650. But the performance is not the only issue, the driver itself is a “construction site“, says the reviewer. Gaming experience is crippled with graphics issues and would often require a restart.
Igor’sLAB: ARC A380 with ‘NOT APPROVED’ award
Igor’sLAB reiterates ComputerBase’s claims that ARC A380 is simply not usable without ReBAR. The design of the GUNNIR card shows obvious cost-cutting and excessive power requirements. The card appears rushed and quickly assembled with thermal pads too thick and too much thermal paste overall. The graphics card was really this bad that Igor gave Arc A380 no approval, which is the second time ever that such ‘award’ was ever given to a tested product by the site.
No mining support yet
But there is still some good news. Intel ARC A380 does not work with any mining software yet. Although crypt-craze is essentially over and mining profitability is questionable, with no support for mining software right now, Intel GPUs should be immune to any changes in this regard.
Intel Arc A380 graphics cards are not yet available for purchase outside of China. The company did not confirm when Arc Alchemist architecture will become available for DIY customers in other regions.
Source: ComputeBase, Igor’sLAB, Review Roundup
Opa, então nova rainha dos drivers ruins.
Eu reclamo da amd, mas eu sabia dar uns dibres nos erros dele, era chato, mas dava pra se virar.Pois é, falo disso literalmente há um ano, que foi quando eu comecei a "conviver" com os drivers da Xe. Perto da Intel, a AMD é o paraíso. Até pra você seria.
Mas é o que eu digo: eles tem uma boa GPU. O produto é bom, o suporte de APIs está lá, não tem falhas de hardware. Ela performa bem quando os drivers deixam. Esses testes aí mesmo provam isso, de um jogo pro outro ela performa acima da GTX 1650 e abaixo da RX 6400. Muito, muito errática.
Mas o que eu tenho visto nos testes mais positivos da Intel é sempre o tal do "engineering driver", que não tá disponível pra usuário final ainda.
Eu reclamo da amd, mas eu sabia dar uns dibres nos erros dele, era chato, mas dava pra se virar.
Mas a tranquilidade da nvidia é sem palavras, absurdo de bom.
DX12 e Vulkan? Bom. DX11 pra trás? Não é bom.
Mas basear o preço das placas na performance do desempenho de DX11 e inferiores é uma put* sacada - realmente só a Intel pra suportar um prejuízo desses.
E supostamente no mês que vem sai um pacote decente de drivers e aplicativos.
A ver.
Vim correndo postar isso.
Basicamente é uma AMD mais barata. Sem ter mais de 10 anos no mercado.